On December 28, 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) extended by 90 days the public comment period on the use of the term “natural” in food and beverage labeling. As discussed in an earlier post, the FDA is interested in receiving comments on the use of the term “natural” for foods that have been genetically engineered or contain ingredients produced using genetic engineering. In addition to food processing, production and manufacturing methods, the FDA may also consider whether the term “natural” implies any nutritional or health benefit. The FDA has received over 3,000 comments to date and will accept comments until May 10, 2016.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) invited public comments on uses of the term “natural” in food and beverage labeling and whether “natural” should apply only to “unprocessed” foods. The FDA’s definition of “food” includes alcohol beverages. The FDA’s current policy is not to restrict use of “natural” unless a food has added color, synthetic substances and certain flavors. The FDA also interprets “natural” to mean that a food does not have anything artificial or synthetic (including colors additives regardless of source) included in, or added to, the food that would not be expected to be in the food. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has a separate policy that defines “natural” with respect to meat and poultry products: (1) the product does not contain any artificial flavor or flavoring, coloring, ingredient, chemical preservative, or any other artificial or synthetic ingredient and (2) the product and its ingredients are not more than minimally processed.
The agency sought comments in part because the FDA received four citizen petitions on the topic, including one citizen petition requesting consistency across FDA and USDA with respect to the definition of “natural.” Federal courts also had requested that the agency determine whether food products with certain ingredients–high fructose corn syrup or ingredients produced using genetic engineering–could be labeled “natural.” The FDA is interested in knowing under what circumstances the use of the term “natural” should be considered false or misleading. In the notice, the agency indicated it could revise its policy on “natural” to address production practices used in agriculture and food manufacturing processes such as fermenting and pasteurizing. The FDA has already received over 1,800 comments in less than two weeks. The docket will remain open until February 10, 2016.